During a recent webinar with our partners CIPHR – ‘Building a case for electronic Right to Work checks‘ – I gave an overview of current Right to Work legislation and the risks associated with employing illegal workers and shared how our solutions help to speed up Right to Work checks. As part of the webinar, I asked participants how they were currently making checks and what they thought were the biggest risks of getting checks wrong. Read on for a summary of the presentation…
2. How do I make a Right to Work check?According to Home Office guidance, there are the 3 steps to a Right to Work check
Obtain: you must see an applicant’s original documents
Copy: you must take a copy of the document for your files and record details of the check (date and who made the check)
When surveyed, 98.5% of our webinar attendees told us that they make Right to Work checks manually by visually inspecting an identity document, photocopying and signing it and then filing a paper copy. A thorough manual process may well be sufficient for your business to comply with legislation and if you ensure that documents reasonably refer to their holder, look genuine and give them the necessary work permissions, this will support your statutory excuse.
However, there are other options to support your Right to Work process. For example, among our survey respondents, 7.5% told us that they also refer to an online database (such as PRADO or Edison TD) to compare the images of documents and access their authenticity and 6% have turned to software to help them make their checks. This additional level of checking may be appropriate for your business if you’re employing a large number of staff, see documents from many different countries or work in a ‘higher-risk’ sector.
3. What are the risks of employing someone without the Right to Work in the UK?
There are many risks of getting Right to Checks wrong, both financial and commercial.
During the same webinar, we asked attendees what they saw as the biggest risk of employing an illegal worker. The results show that the greatest concern is damage to a business’ reputation (48.5%). A negative immigration enforcement visit can indeed damage an organisation’s brand and their trust with customers and supplier. A quarterly list of fined businesses such as this one is published by the Home Office and the press regularly report on businesses that have been visited by Immigration Enforcement – e.g. the high-profile case of Byron Burgers who had dozens of workers arrested in a raid by immigration officials.
The risk of fines also worries our participants (40% of responses). If your business doesn’t carry out Right to Work checks properly and is found to employ an illegal worker, you could face a civil penalty of up to £20,000 per illegal worker and the Home Office issued fines totally more than £38 million in 2017.
Fraud was also a concern to 8.5% of participants. For many of our customers, their counter-fraud teams are concentrating on preventing customers from accessing services to which they’re not entitled, such as housing, bank accounts and loans. However, Insider Fraud can also be a risk if you’re employing staff who aren’t who they say they are.
Lastly, our survey participants believe that illegal working can also be disruptive to a business (3.3%). I believe this is due both to the visit from Immigration Enforcement and the associated investigation and due to the need to replace and retrain staff. The Byron Burgers raids in 2016 are reported to have led to ‘very tough trading’ for several months, following negative PR and staffing disruption.
What should I do next?
Tony Machin, CEO
Our CEO since 2013 has led our business through a program of significant upgrades in technology and services and has huge experience helping businesses introduce the right processes for identity document checks.
Want to find out more?
Sign up to receive updates
Receive notifications from the TrustID blog direct to your inbox. Simply leave us your email address in the box below.